Skip to main content

Yellowstone Association E-Newsletter December 2009

When we visited Yellowstone this summer, they told us we were on top of a volcano, but it's a little hard to believe until you see something like this.


Yellowstone Association E-Newsletter January 2010

Scientists have confirmed the existence of a magma plume under Yellowstone that fills a magma chamber 20 percent larger than previous estimates. Using a network of 150 seismographs that recorded seismic waves from earthquakes around the world as they passed over an area extending from Missoula, Montana, to Evanston, Wyoming, a team of scientists was able to create a first-of-its-kind three-dimensional image of the plume. Recent scientific debate has focused on whether volcanoes such as Yellowstone were created by magma plumes-fingers of molten rock rising from deep in the Earth-or from shallow pockets of magma. The research, which involved scientists from Utah, Massachusetts, Michigan, Norway, Taiwan, and Switzerland, not only confirms the existence of a plume, but also indicates it extends at least 500 miles into the Earth's mantle (the layer between the Earth's crust and its outer core). University of Utah professor emeritus of geophysics and Yellowstone Volcano Observatory scientist Dr. Robert Smith says the plume may go even deeper, perhaps originating from the core-mantle boundary some 1,800 miles deep.

Dr. Smith calls this latest research a major development in understanding how Yellowstone works-what happened in the past and what could happen in the future. He adds that these findings do not indicate that Yellowstone is on the verge of a major eruption, which he calls "a very rare thing." The region's last three major eruptions have taken place at intervals of about 700,000 years, with the last giant eruption occurring approximately 640,000 years ago.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Climate Change and Open Science - WSJ.com

This Wall Street Journal article Climate Change and Open Science - WSJ .com made the right basic point about liberal hypocrisy in the Climate Change debate, but disappointingly it failed to cite the best sources of real information from an unbiased scientific point of view. I believe that source is Dr. S. Fred Singer & Dr. Craig D. Idso , from the Science and Environmental Policy Project and Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, who coauthored "Climate Change Reconsidered; The Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change" published in 2009. In this book, the petition letter shown here from Dr. Frederick Seitz ( Ph . D. Physics) President Emeritus of Rockefeller University was published. Dr. Seitz circulated this letter: urging fellow academics with qualifications in the physical sciences to sign the petition at http://www.petitionproject.com/ and thereby acknowledge their agreement with this statement in the petition: Accor...

The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network

My employer (Cisco) published its most recent forward looking study of the Internet today. It's called " The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network " and although I haven't studied it in detail yet, I scanned it this morning and I liked what I saw. Those who know me will not be surprised that I particularly liked the three dimensional evaluation criteria that they used to frame their analysis. Lately nearly everything I do ends up finding its way into some sort of analytical cube like this. I've been wondering whether there is something wrong with me that I can't seem to frame things simply in two dimensions. Glad to have company.

DouglasRoss.com

Network Solutions is having a sale on URL's. Mine (http://www.douglasross.com) doesn't do anything at the moment (I'm saving it for a rainy day) but it was coming up on ten years and I needed to renew it to protect my name. So I decided to take them up on their pay-in-advance 20 year package sale for $279.00 or $13.95 per year (about half of the regular annual fee...probably not that good a deal in hindsight.) But the kicker was, after I hit the pay button it dawned on me that I'll be over 83 years old when this thing expires. How creepy is that? If I make it I'll take it as a good sign and re-up for another 20 years. And by then maybe I'll have done something with it.