Skip to main content

Yellowstone Association E-Newsletter December 2009

When we visited Yellowstone this summer, they told us we were on top of a volcano, but it's a little hard to believe until you see something like this.


Yellowstone Association E-Newsletter January 2010

Scientists have confirmed the existence of a magma plume under Yellowstone that fills a magma chamber 20 percent larger than previous estimates. Using a network of 150 seismographs that recorded seismic waves from earthquakes around the world as they passed over an area extending from Missoula, Montana, to Evanston, Wyoming, a team of scientists was able to create a first-of-its-kind three-dimensional image of the plume. Recent scientific debate has focused on whether volcanoes such as Yellowstone were created by magma plumes-fingers of molten rock rising from deep in the Earth-or from shallow pockets of magma. The research, which involved scientists from Utah, Massachusetts, Michigan, Norway, Taiwan, and Switzerland, not only confirms the existence of a plume, but also indicates it extends at least 500 miles into the Earth's mantle (the layer between the Earth's crust and its outer core). University of Utah professor emeritus of geophysics and Yellowstone Volcano Observatory scientist Dr. Robert Smith says the plume may go even deeper, perhaps originating from the core-mantle boundary some 1,800 miles deep.

Dr. Smith calls this latest research a major development in understanding how Yellowstone works-what happened in the past and what could happen in the future. He adds that these findings do not indicate that Yellowstone is on the verge of a major eruption, which he calls "a very rare thing." The region's last three major eruptions have taken place at intervals of about 700,000 years, with the last giant eruption occurring approximately 640,000 years ago.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Leonardo da Vinci

Leonardo da Vinci by Walter Isaacson My rating: 5 of 5 stars Having read only snippets and never a complete biography of Leonardo da Vinci before, I have no basis of comparison from which to judge the accuracy of Isaacson's beautifully written account of Leonardo's life. Assuming it's accurate, Isaacson's account leaves no doubt that; the man was a true genius, he led a fascinating life much of which was enabled by being born near the beginning of the Renaissance in Europe and he was fortunate to have been associated with so many other brilliant characters. The only minor issue I had with the book was not always being able to tell exactly what the current scholarly research consensus is about the many mysteries of Leonardo's life versus Isaacson's opinion. The book is well worth reading. View all my reviews

Whitehouse Blog

I thought President Obama's inaugural speech was a little disappointing when read for substance from afar, although I can imagine that it might have seemed more uplifting in person. I think the Wall Street Journal got it right in their pre -inaugural " The Opacity of Hope " editorial as they concluded: "The complicated nature of our world means that every modern Presidency is to some extent a leap into the unknown. Mr. Obama's meteoric rise makes him a bigger leap than most. We don't know if he is a genuine man of the left, or a more traditional pragmatist. The audacity of our hope is that as President he will use his considerable talents to return his party to the policies of growth, opportunity and the vigorous defense of U.S. interests that marked it the last time the country had such great expectations for a Democratic President -- under JFK." To me, Obama didn't start well with his first official act being this rather vague and plainly accusa...