Skip to main content

WHAT BLOGS COST AMERICAN BUSINESS

Have you noticed the amount of big-media-trashing-blogs activity lately? Take for example an article by Bradley Johnson in AdAge on October 24, 2005 [QwikFIND ID: AAR05Y] which begins with this startling assertion:
"...U.S. workers in 2005 will waste the equivalent of 551,000 years reading blogs. Currently, the time employees spend reading non-work blogs is the equivalent of 2.3 million jobs."

So that's interesting! AdAge thinks they have proven that employees are "wasting" huge amounts of work time reading "non-work" blogs. What's the source of their evidence that non-work blog reading is a big time-wasting problem?

1. First, AdAge seems to have used ComScore's classification system to put all blogs into four categories; (1) business, (2) tech & media, (3) political/news and (4) everything else.

2. Second, admitting their lack of real data about whether the information in blogs in the ComScore categories are work-related or not, AdAge made a set of value judgments:

100% of business blogs are work related
50% of tech & media blogs are work-related
25% of political/news blogs are work-related
0% of all other blogs are work-related

3. Thirdly, AdAge did some kind of "analysis" based on [unidentified] "blog-related surveys and data" which suggests that about 25% [35 million] of all workers spend an average of 40 minutes per day reading blogs. That equals 2.91 million man-years spent on blog reading annually of which AdAge estimates with the scoring above that 0.551 million of those blog-reading man-years [~20%] were wasted.

4. Lastly, they threw in some semi-confirming comments from sources like a Nielsen/NetRatings research manager who says "blog time probably comes in addition to regular surfing -- meaning more time on the Web but less time on the job."

This whole line of reasoning suggests a bit of hypocrisy. In the first place their headline is wrong. By their own logic, 80% of blog reading is apparently a good thing [i.e. not a waste of work time]. AdAge also appears to be implying that, if we must read, employees like us would be more productive reading mainsteam media like AdAge rather than "wasting our time" on blogs. Could it be that AdAge has a little blog-envy?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DouglasRoss.com

Network Solutions is having a sale on URL's. Mine (http://www.douglasross.com) doesn't do anything at the moment (I'm saving it for a rainy day) but it was coming up on ten years and I needed to renew it to protect my name. So I decided to take them up on their pay-in-advance 20 year package sale for $279.00 or $13.95 per year (about half of the regular annual fee...probably not that good a deal in hindsight.) But the kicker was, after I hit the pay button it dawned on me that I'll be over 83 years old when this thing expires. How creepy is that? If I make it I'll take it as a good sign and re-up for another 20 years. And by then maybe I'll have done something with it.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network

My employer (Cisco) published its most recent forward looking study of the Internet today. It's called " The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network " and although I haven't studied it in detail yet, I scanned it this morning and I liked what I saw. Those who know me will not be surprised that I particularly liked the three dimensional evaluation criteria that they used to frame their analysis. Lately nearly everything I do ends up finding its way into some sort of analytical cube like this. I've been wondering whether there is something wrong with me that I can't seem to frame things simply in two dimensions. Glad to have company.
Post a Comment
Read more

Mindless Eating

I listened to a lecture today by Brian Wansink, Ph.D., author of Mindless Eating, a book about better eating habits that lead to weight loss and better health. It's amazing how simple things we get use to are really bad eating habits. Here's an example. Take two normal table glasses. One is tall and thin like a water glass, the other short and wide like a cocktail glass. Wansink's research shows that most people (even professional bar tenders) will fill the short glass with 38% more liquid than the tall glass. Why, because we're conditioned to be a better judge of the volume we want by height than by width. Same thing with the size of the plate we use to eat with. If we use a smaller plate we'll eat significantly less because using a larger plate we tend to fill it up and eat more unconsiously even though we'd feel perfectly fine with the volume of a smaller plate. I'm going to give his " Mindless Method " a try and see if I can shed this stomach o...
Post a Comment
Read more