Skip to main content

Yellowstone Association E-Newsletter December 2009

When we visited Yellowstone this summer, they told us we were on top of a volcano, but it's a little hard to believe until you see something like this.


Yellowstone Association E-Newsletter January 2010

Scientists have confirmed the existence of a magma plume under Yellowstone that fills a magma chamber 20 percent larger than previous estimates. Using a network of 150 seismographs that recorded seismic waves from earthquakes around the world as they passed over an area extending from Missoula, Montana, to Evanston, Wyoming, a team of scientists was able to create a first-of-its-kind three-dimensional image of the plume. Recent scientific debate has focused on whether volcanoes such as Yellowstone were created by magma plumes-fingers of molten rock rising from deep in the Earth-or from shallow pockets of magma. The research, which involved scientists from Utah, Massachusetts, Michigan, Norway, Taiwan, and Switzerland, not only confirms the existence of a plume, but also indicates it extends at least 500 miles into the Earth's mantle (the layer between the Earth's crust and its outer core). University of Utah professor emeritus of geophysics and Yellowstone Volcano Observatory scientist Dr. Robert Smith says the plume may go even deeper, perhaps originating from the core-mantle boundary some 1,800 miles deep.

Dr. Smith calls this latest research a major development in understanding how Yellowstone works-what happened in the past and what could happen in the future. He adds that these findings do not indicate that Yellowstone is on the verge of a major eruption, which he calls "a very rare thing." The region's last three major eruptions have taken place at intervals of about 700,000 years, with the last giant eruption occurring approximately 640,000 years ago.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Malone on America and Obama

You just have to love Dr. John Malone. The guy's a certified genius but also a "what you see is what you get" straight-shooting kind of guy. His Ph.D. is from Johns Hopkins, BA is science from Yale, worth $2.3 billion (according to Forbes, but probably way low because they just couldn't find all of it). He ran TCI (America's largest Cable company) and sold it to ATT for $54 billion. He's the kind of person that you could just sit and listen to for hours. He's so logical, well informed and well spoken. In a recent interview with the Wall Street Journal here's a few nuggets from what he had to say... (I agree with him about Obama) WSJ: What are the biggest risks for Liberty right now? Mr. Malone: I think the biggest concern I have for the next year or two would be on the retail side, because of the consumer sentiment and the macro conditions. The concerns really tend to be much more macro: Is America going to make it, rather than are we going to make it?...

Barry Schwartz - The Paradox of Choice

MediaPost Publications - Americans Get More Channels, Watch Fewer Of Them, Especially Broadcast - 03/13/2006 Ironically, Barry Schwartz spoke at PC Forum last night about the Paradox of Choice, and what did I wake up to this morning. Another possible example of too much choice in the channels people have to choose from on television. I wonder whether the "a la carte" crowd has thought about this problem. I'll have to ask Prof. Schwartz about that today.

The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network

My employer (Cisco) published its most recent forward looking study of the Internet today. It's called " The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network " and although I haven't studied it in detail yet, I scanned it this morning and I liked what I saw. Those who know me will not be surprised that I particularly liked the three dimensional evaluation criteria that they used to frame their analysis. Lately nearly everything I do ends up finding its way into some sort of analytical cube like this. I've been wondering whether there is something wrong with me that I can't seem to frame things simply in two dimensions. Glad to have company.