Skip to main content

The Truth about Torture

Charles Kruathammer makes a very well reasonsed argument in The Weekly Standard for specific and extremely limited exceptions to the general "rule" that torture should be banned. I find two things praticularly convincing about Kruathammer's arguments:
  1. He forces us to deal with the question of whether any use of torture at any time is ever justified in any circumstances. His conclusion is that we must "be honest about [the necessity of sometimes] doing terrible things [like torture]" in those rare cases where by doing so, there is a high probability that we might prevent even more terrible things. Nearly everyone agrees that torture isn't necessarily always the best solution even in extreme circumstances. However, logically the problem is that there is clearly some probability that torture might sometimes be the only practical solution.
  2. Another thing that occurred to me was that we [Americans & British] have a tendancy to think of ourselves as being against torture in the abstract as a "matter of honor." Andrew Sullivan and others have suggested this and tied it [illogically in my opinion] to the otherwise quite sensible idea that tortured confessions in a legal system make no sense. I suspect that many of the ninty US Senators who voted for McCain's amendment [which says that torture is an absolute "no torture ever"] are really covering their political asses with "pieties about [being against] the evils of torture" while at the same time counting on the likelyhood that, in extremely serious cases, some "black ops" special forces or CIA guy somewhere will somehow do the dirty dead for us in secret and we won't have to know about it. In other words, we are just as hypocritical about this subject as we are about many others.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

White House wants to hear from you about Obamacare (if you agree with them)

I subscribe to e-mails from The White House (like the one below) to keep track of what they are actually saying. Normally their e-mails are recitations of the President's talking points and don't add anything meaningful. However, this time David Simas was soliciting input to prove their case that the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") is actually working. So, since I involuntarily have new health coverage as of January 1 (that's what The White House was asking for) I decided to submit my own "story." Here's what I submitted: I am retired. I pay for Medicare but I don't rely on it for quality health care. I have new coverage as of January 1st which I was forced to purchase privately as an individual. I believe I was driven to this largely by one of the unintended consequences of Obamacare which is that large employers will now more easily drop retiree group medical plans (to pay for other costs of Obamacare) citing Obamacare as the backstop for t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: Leonardo da Vinci

Leonardo da Vinci by Walter Isaacson My rating: 5 of 5 stars Having read only snippets and never a complete biography of Leonardo da Vinci before, I have no basis of comparison from which to judge the accuracy of Isaacson's beautifully written account of Leonardo's life. Assuming it's accurate, Isaacson's account leaves no doubt that; the man was a true genius, he led a fascinating life much of which was enabled by being born near the beginning of the Renaissance in Europe and he was fortunate to have been associated with so many other brilliant characters. The only minor issue I had with the book was not always being able to tell exactly what the current scholarly research consensus is about the many mysteries of Leonardo's life versus Isaacson's opinion. The book is well worth reading. View all my reviews
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: The Prophet

The Prophet by Kahlil Gibran My rating: 5 of 5 stars View all my reviews
Post a Comment
Read more