Skip to main content

WHAT BLOGS COST AMERICAN BUSINESS

Have you noticed the amount of big-media-trashing-blogs activity lately? Take for example an article by Bradley Johnson in AdAge on October 24, 2005 [QwikFIND ID: AAR05Y] which begins with this startling assertion:
"...U.S. workers in 2005 will waste the equivalent of 551,000 years reading blogs. Currently, the time employees spend reading non-work blogs is the equivalent of 2.3 million jobs."

So that's interesting! AdAge thinks they have proven that employees are "wasting" huge amounts of work time reading "non-work" blogs. What's the source of their evidence that non-work blog reading is a big time-wasting problem?

1. First, AdAge seems to have used ComScore's classification system to put all blogs into four categories; (1) business, (2) tech & media, (3) political/news and (4) everything else.

2. Second, admitting their lack of real data about whether the information in blogs in the ComScore categories are work-related or not, AdAge made a set of value judgments:

100% of business blogs are work related
50% of tech & media blogs are work-related
25% of political/news blogs are work-related
0% of all other blogs are work-related

3. Thirdly, AdAge did some kind of "analysis" based on [unidentified] "blog-related surveys and data" which suggests that about 25% [35 million] of all workers spend an average of 40 minutes per day reading blogs. That equals 2.91 million man-years spent on blog reading annually of which AdAge estimates with the scoring above that 0.551 million of those blog-reading man-years [~20%] were wasted.

4. Lastly, they threw in some semi-confirming comments from sources like a Nielsen/NetRatings research manager who says "blog time probably comes in addition to regular surfing -- meaning more time on the Web but less time on the job."

This whole line of reasoning suggests a bit of hypocrisy. In the first place their headline is wrong. By their own logic, 80% of blog reading is apparently a good thing [i.e. not a waste of work time]. AdAge also appears to be implying that, if we must read, employees like us would be more productive reading mainsteam media like AdAge rather than "wasting our time" on blogs. Could it be that AdAge has a little blog-envy?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Malone on America and Obama

You just have to love Dr. John Malone. The guy's a certified genius but also a "what you see is what you get" straight-shooting kind of guy. His Ph.D. is from Johns Hopkins, BA is science from Yale, worth $2.3 billion (according to Forbes, but probably way low because they just couldn't find all of it). He ran TCI (America's largest Cable company) and sold it to ATT for $54 billion. He's the kind of person that you could just sit and listen to for hours. He's so logical, well informed and well spoken. In a recent interview with the Wall Street Journal here's a few nuggets from what he had to say... (I agree with him about Obama) WSJ: What are the biggest risks for Liberty right now? Mr. Malone: I think the biggest concern I have for the next year or two would be on the retail side, because of the consumer sentiment and the macro conditions. The concerns really tend to be much more macro: Is America going to make it, rather than are we going to make it?...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network

My employer (Cisco) published its most recent forward looking study of the Internet today. It's called " The Evolving Internet: A look ahead to 2025 by Cisco and the Monitor Group's Global Business Network " and although I haven't studied it in detail yet, I scanned it this morning and I liked what I saw. Those who know me will not be surprised that I particularly liked the three dimensional evaluation criteria that they used to frame their analysis. Lately nearly everything I do ends up finding its way into some sort of analytical cube like this. I've been wondering whether there is something wrong with me that I can't seem to frame things simply in two dimensions. Glad to have company.
Post a Comment
Read more

Health Care

I spent nearly three hours today trying to understand the meaning of the Obamacare legislation. I am a reasonably intelligent individual, I have experience analyzing legislation (in my work), I know generally where to look and despite all that, I found it to be basically incomprehensible. This suggests to me that most people; don't have a clue what has happened, how it will effect them, why it was necessary (0r not), when it will take effect, what it will cost, what the alternatives might have been (or might still be), or in general what they should think about it. I'm going to try again to decipher it and when I do, to write here what my opinion is. Right now I am suspicious of it simply because it's too complicated to understand.
Post a Comment
Read more